0333 900 0101

Shielded (STP) vs Unshielded (UTP) – Why Your Business Should Choose One Over the Other

Shielding is a surgical tool, not a box-ticking exercise. Over-specify and you waste budget on foil that adds nothing; under-specify and risk packet errors that haunt every software upgrade.

The hum behind the packets

Every Ethernet packet that keeps your cloud workload alive begins life as a differential voltage on two tiny copper conductors. Those conductors share ceiling space with LED drivers, lift motors, Wi-Fi radios and 5 G repeaters – all noisy neighbours in electromagnetic terms. Shielding is the tool cabling engineers use when that noise threatens performance, yet many projects still default to unshielded cable because it is “what we have always pulled”. Understanding when the extra foil and drain wire earn their keep is therefore critical if you want trouble-free 10 G links today and 90 W PoE++ tomorrow.

At ACCL we install both shielded and unshielded systems every week, from Cat 6A F/UTP office roll-outs in the City to Cat 7A S/FTP backbones in industrial paint-shops. The observations below come from that daily field experience rather than pure theory.

What shielding really does (and does not do)

A shield is a metallic barrier – usually aluminium/polyester foil, sometimes braided copper – that surrounds one pair or all four pairs in the cable. It serves two purposes:

  1. Containment of outgoing energy so your data lines do not radiate and fall foul of EMC regulations.

  2. Exclusion of incoming energy so external fields cannot induce currents that corrupt the signal.

What shielding does not do is improve the basic NEXT and FEXT performance set out in ISO/IEC 11801; that is governed by twist geometry and separator design. Nor does shielding extend the 90-metre channel limit – physics still applies.

Anatomy lesson – the alphabet soup of F/UTP, U/FTP, S/FTP

If your tender specification reads like Scrabble tiles, here is the quick decoder:

  • U/UTP – no overall foil, no individual pair foil. The global default for Cat 5e and Cat 6.

  • F/UTP – a single foil round all pairs; the modern minimum for Cat 6A in Europe.

  • U/FTP – each pair shielded, no overall foil; common in slim Cat 6A where diameter matters.

  • S/FTP – braided screen plus individual foils; the heavy-duty option for Cat 7A & Cat 8.

The first letter describes the overall shield (U = none, F = foil, S = braid). The second group shows per-pair shielding.

Performance under real-world interference

1. Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)

In a typical office the worst offenders are LED drivers switching at high dV/dt and 4 G/5 G small-cell repeaters splashing RF across 700 MHz-3.5 GHz. A well-installed F/UTP cable shows 15–20 dB better coupling attenuation than U/UTP in that band – enough to turn a marginal 10 G-BASE-T link into a rock-solid pass on your field tester. In anechoic-chamber trials ACCL ran for a medical client, Cat 6A U/UTP links next to 2 kW MRI gradient-amp cables failed return-loss limits at 500 MHz; swapping to U/FTP solved the issue without rerouting containment.

2. Alien crosstalk

Category 6A raises the test frequency to 500 MHz, where pair-to-pair and cable-to-cable coupling becomes the top failure mode. Individual pair shields in U/FTP and S/FTP designs dampen that coupling so installers can run tighter bundle counts. That directly affects PoE heat budgeting because fatter bundles trap more heat – shielded cabling lets you achieve the same port density with lower temperature rise.

3. PoE stability

High power over Ethernet draws continuous 600 mA per pair. Unshielded cables act like long antennas, emitting common-mode noise that back-feeds into sensitive audio and control lines. A continuous aluminium foil coupled to a low-impedance earth starves that antenna action. In our Cabling Fire Safety audits we routinely measure 3–5 °C lower bundle temperature on F/UTP versus U/UTP when both run 90 W PoE++.

Cost, installation and maintenance – the bits the brochure glosses over

Material price. Shielded Cat 6A typically lands 10-15 % higher per metre than unshielded. Once you add shielded modular jacks and controlled earthing hardware, the premium can approach 25 %.

Termination time. Modern tool-less shielded jacks have closed the gap, yet crimping the drain wire, folding the foil and closing a metal housing still add perhaps 30 seconds per outlet. On a 2 000-port floor that equates to an extra day of labour.

Bonding and grounding. A shield does nothing unless it is bonded to the building’s supplementary bonding network (SBN). BS EN 50310:2020 stipulates ≤0.2 Ω impedance back to the main earth bar. Poorly executed bonds can create earth-loops that inject more noise than they remove. If you choose STP, budget for proper earth bars and refer to our guide on equipotential bonding.

Connector mix-ups. Field staff sometimes mate UTP patch leads into STP panel ports, breaking the shield path. ACCL avoids that by colour-coding cords – grey for UTP, black for STP – and including it in the Data-Cabling Audit checklist.

Standards and accreditation – why “Category 6A” alone is not enough

ISO/IEC 11801 and BS EN 50173 treat shielded and unshielded systems as peers provided each passes its own performance class. That means a U/UTP channel can achieve Class EA just as an F/UTP can. Where shielded wins is coupling attenuation (aCa) and transfer impedance (ZT) – parameters the standards allow but do not mandate for compliance. Savvy specifiers therefore add these values in the Employer’s Requirements so contractors cannot down-spec after contract award.

For PoE++ projects you should also cite IEC 60512-99-002 (mating-cycle current-carrying capacity) because high current plus poor shielding equals melted connectors in worst-case fault loops.

Application cases – matching shield type to business environment

Open-plan offices and schools. Unless the space hosts dense AV or 5 G radios, Cat 6A U/UTP is usually adequate. For Wi-Fi 6E backhaul at 10 G we still pass UTP channels daily provided containment keeps 200 mm separation from mains.

Media production suites. Audio mixing desks and timecode cabling hate stray hum. ACCL standard practice is Cat 6A F/UTP in star-quad layouts plus star-earthed panels.

Industrial and healthcare plant rooms. Variable-speed drives and medical imaging push us straight to S/FTP Cat 7A or Cat 8. Foil-only designs can suffer foil cracking under constant vibration; a braided outer screen absorbs the mechanical stress.

Historic buildings. Space is limited, earth paths are unpredictable and chiselling new bonding bars is heritage-officer hell. Here we recommend premium U/FTP slimline cables that control alien crosstalk without an overall shield, avoiding earthing headaches.

Decision framework – five questions before the purchase order

  1. What EMI sources lie within 30 cm of the data routes? If the answer includes VSD motors, radio repeaters or high-current LED drivers, shield.

  2. Will the links carry 10 G or above? Higher frequencies amplify alien crosstalk; consider at least F/UTP.

  3. How much PoE power per bundle? More than 30 W per port favours shielding for thermal as well as EMC reasons.

  4. Is the building’s bonding network modern and documented? If not, unshielded avoids hidden earth-loop risks.

  5. What is the project’s tolerance for install time and CAPEX premium? Tight programmes may steer you back to UTP unless risk analysis screams otherwise.

Walk through those questions with an ACCL consultant and the right answer usually reveals itself in minutes.

Implementation with ACCL – taking shielded projects from spec to sign-off

Because we are accredited partners with Excel and Leviton, our shielded installations qualify for 25-year manufacturer warranties. We bond every panel to a labelled earth bar, test coupling attenuation on sample links with an aCa clamp and document results in the O&M manual. If you opt for unshielded, we model cable separation in the design phase and verify compliance during our Structured Data Cabling walkthrough.

Should unforeseen interference surface after occupancy, our data-cabling repair services can retrofit shielded whips or fibre uplinks without ripping out trunking.

Conclusion – shield intelligently, not reflexively

Shielding is a surgical tool, not a box-ticking exercise. Over-specify and you waste budget on foil that adds nothing; under-specify and risk packet errors that haunt every software upgrade. By weighing electromagnetic environment, PoE regime, bonding quality and long-term growth, you can decide with confidence – and sleep soundly when the factory floor powers up at 6 a.m.

Talk to ACCL for a site survey or specification review and ensure the cable you install today remains silent, stable and utterly invisible to the noisy world around it.

Get in touch today

Have a no-obligation chat with one of our data cabling experts, who can recommend a solution to suit your requirements and budget.