Since the start of the pandemic in 2020, the interest in thermal cameras has increased exponentially around the world.
Thermal cameras are not new technology , but in the fight against the global pandemic, the heat sensing technology has taken centre-stage as one of the tools used to detect high temperatures, which could potentially detect COVID-19.
However, sentiment is mixed on thermal cameras, they can be viewed with a suspicion that often comes from a simple lack of knowledge of how the technology works.
Conversations around privacy and AI and questions about their effectiveness are raised.
Yet, a lot of countries around the world have invested in this technology in hopes of decreasing the spread rate of the virus and increasing the chances of normality in our society.
Given this, we analysed articles published in each region of the world to gather the sentiment of thermal cameras in order to understand if these nations value the worth of thermal cameras as a positive or negative factor in our new daily lives.
Simply put, we are asking the questions:

North America
The market for thermal cameras is exponentially rising, they have been implemented in various places that would see mass gathering of people. These places are mainly airports, restaurants, shops, offices and even government monuments/plazas.
The sentiment from the general public is quite positive, it gives them a sense of security and safety, meaning a lot of businesses are investing into this technology so they can get the economy moving.
However, there is still a lot of scepticism of its effectiveness, even thermal imaging experts have said that the usage of this technology isn’t precise due to the nature of COVID-19.
Furthermore, scientists have added that the limitation of these technologies is biological. The skin on a person’s face is not one single temperature, and does not uniformly reflect their core body temperature, which is needed to assess fever.
There are also privacy concerns due to the more complex thermal imaging cameras which are AI meaning the detection of individuals with high temperature would also link or access their own information.
Africa
Not much could be said about the sentiment of thermal cameras, generally, it is highly positive, it is somewhat required to have them. Some African countries have struggled to contain the virus more than the others, meaning some governments and businesses are looking for various solutions in containing the virus and one of those ways are thermal cameras.
There are still some low levels of skepticism, however, this is mainly influenced by Western scientists’ notion.
Asia
Parts of Asia, especially China is already a heavily surveilled country so the implementation of thermal cameras was nothing new. People have accepted it with no resistance as surveillance is very much a way of life.
However, in South Asia, specifically in India workers have voiced concerns over more than just temperature being monitored, much of the worries that have come about are privacy concerns.
Thermal imaging has allowed large-scale travel to return and food markets to reopen. It hasn’t replaced masks but is implemented alongside them and sanitary regulations.
Europe
Cameras are being used to allow the safe travel of people across the EU. Questions and concerns are arising about the intrusive nature as many people don’t want mass surveillance.
Temperatures can vary and thousands of other health symptoms cause a temperature so thermal cameras can be inaccurate. GDPR could become an issue as thermal imaging is still a grey area. Generally people want to feel safe so most have accepted it.
Fever detection cameras are becoming more normal in gyms, workplaces and shops. However, there are still worries among Brits about privacy concerns.
Middle East
Thermal imaging is mainly used in public sectors. The wealthier regions are combining technology together to provide multiple services during the pandemic.
Evidence is still inconclusive as to whether thermal imaging is helping to prevent the spread of covid in the Middle East. Other than malls and public gathering places, employers have not invested as much into thermal imaging as other regions.
Latin America
Latin America has one of the lowest sentiments of every region. Mainly affected by funding. Security and military infrastructure is backed by thermal cameras.
Buenos Aires subway/train station is now using thermal cameras until
lockdowns and quarantine ends. They are not removing the technology after herd immunity. Thermal imaging used on Rio Negro police officers to avoid infections in the security force. Surveillance of the general population has really taken off.

Conclusion
So there we have it, thermal cameras without a doubt have grown exponentially within the period of the pandemic and it’ll most likely grow even further within the decade. However, there are still incremental layers of skepticism which even the experts and scientists themselves have reiterated.
The main concerns are the effectiveness of detecting COVID-19 or various illnesses, experts have said that many are investing too much to be given inaccurate information. Furthermore, there are also concerns of privacy, some thermal imaging have implemented AI/smart technology which could even go as far as to access an individual’s information on the spot.
Yet with the need to go further and past this pandemic period, businesses, governments and nations alike will look at a variety of ways to adapt and ease their clients, workers and people during these times; and one of those ways is the integration of thermal imaging technology.

Frequently Asked Questions – Global Thermal Camera Sentiment
Q. How was this research on thermal camera sentiment carried out?
Over 400 public news articles about thermal imaging camera deployment worldwide, published between the start of the pandemic and the study’s date, were analysed for language and sentiment using automated text analysis tools.
Q. What industries use thermal imaging cameras globally?
They’re used across healthcare, public spaces, manufacturing and transport for reliable non-contact monitoring and temperature checks, particularly where workplace safety and compliance matter.
Q. Does global attitude towards thermal cameras vary by region?
Yes. Sentiment ranges from positive to cautious depending on the region, shaped by local privacy norms and events – some areas prioritise safety and automation, while others raise concerns about privacy and ethical use.
Q. What are the main benefits of thermal imaging identified in the research?
Non-invasive, fast temperature screening, early detection to help prevent the spread of illness, and improved stakeholder confidence and business continuity.
Q. What’s the main concern organisations should manage with thermal imaging deployment?
Balancing the benefits of the technology with privacy protection – staying compliant with data protection laws and communicating clearly with staff and visitors about how cameras are used.
Q. Is thermal imaging CCTV still relevant now the pandemic has passed?
Yes. Beyond health screening, thermal cameras are valued for broader security and monitoring applications such as perimeter protection and detecting equipment issues in low-visibility conditions.




